Anderson v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al, No. 1:2013cv00056 - Document 18 (D. Mont. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER; granting 8 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; adopting 15 Findings and Recommendations.; denying 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; dismissing 1 Motion to Quash. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 5/20/2013. (ACL, ) Modified on 5/20/2013 mailed a copy to petitioner (ACL, ).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Anderson v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al Doc. 18 FILED MAY 202013 Clerk, u,s. DisVla Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DIIIIict orMonlilna Helena FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION TANA ANDERSON, No, CV-13-56-BLG-SEH Petitioner, vs, ORDER UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, and CIANNE KALLUNKI, Revenue Agent, Respondents. On April 23, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn S, Ostby entered Findings and Recommendations l in this matter. Petitioner did not file objections, but filed a document entitled "Petitioner's Motion for Additional Time to File a Response to Respondent's Reply in Support of Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Petition to Quash" on May 9,2013. J Docket No. 15. -1 Dockets.Justia.com No review is required of proposed findings and recommendations to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140,149-152 (1986). However, this Court will review Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendations for clear error. Upon review, I find no clear error in Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in fulL ORDERED: 1. Petitioner's Motion for Additional Time to File a Response to Respondent's Reply in Support of Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Petition to Quash2 is DENIED. 2. Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Petition to Quash 3 is GRANTED. 3. Petitioner's Petition to Quash IRS Third Party Summons' is DISMISSED. 2 Docket No. 17. 3 Docket No.8. 4 Docket No. 1. -2 4. The Clerk of DATED this OlO fi:rt is directed to enter a judgment of dismissal. day of May, 2013. ~~fI6-1J~ 'SE.HADDON United States District Judge ·3·
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
