Switzer v. BIA Crow Tribal Police, No. 1:2012cv00115 - Document 14 (D. Mont. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 in full. 2 Complaint isDISMISSED. Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 3/19/2013. Mailed to Switzer. (TAG, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Switzer v. BIA Crow Tribal Police Doc. 14 FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAR 19 2013 FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA Cl~~ U SOf"-- vvurt District "-ยท _ .,..llict . "KJfltana B'.111ngs BILLINGS DIVISION WILLIAM ZARNEL SWITZER, CV-12-115-BLG-RFC-CSO Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE BIA CROW TRIBAL POLICE, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn Ostby recommends this matter be dismissed because prose Plaintiff William Switzer failed to comply with a prior Order directing him to file an amended complaint demonstrating subject matter jurisdiction. Docs. 11 & 12. Switzer has yet to respond to Judge Ostby's prior Orders or recommendation (doc. 12) that this case be dismissed. Moreover, the copy of the Findings and Recommendations mailed to Switzer was returned "undeliverable." Doc. 13. Accordingly, Switzer having failed to demonstrate a basis for jurisdiction or to follow Orders of this Court, IT IS ORDERED that his Complaint is DISMISSED. I Dockets.Justia.com IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket reflect that this Court certifies pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3)(A) that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk of Court shall close this matter and enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Ru~Civil Procedure. DATED the j{j'_ day of March, 2013. CHARD F. CEBULL UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
