Cole et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al, No. 1:2009cv00021 - Document 142 (D. Mont. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING Defendant Oravec's 126 Motion for Summary Judgment Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 7/22/2014. (ACL, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cole et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al Doc. 142 FILED JUL 2 2 Z014 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, u.s. District Court District Of Montana Helena FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION EARLINE COLE, as an individual and as personal representative of the ESTATE OF STEVEN BEARCANE, et aI., Plaintiffs, CV 09-21-BLG-SEH ORDER vs. MATTHEW ORAVEC, in his individual capacity, Defendant. On June 26, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn S. Ostby entered her Findings and Recommendations l on Defendant's Motion for Summary JUdgment. 2 Plaintiffs filed objections on July 17,2014. 3 Plaintiffs' three page filing asserts no specific objection and only references the Court to previous I (Doc. 138.) 2 (Doc. 126.) 3 (Doc. 141.) Plaintiffs received an extension of time to file objections on July 10,2014. (See Doc. 140.) Dockets.Justia.com arguments raised in Plaintiffs' initial response brief to the motion for summary judgment. 4 These objections on their face do not rise to the level contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b )(2), which require the filing of "specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Nevertheless, the Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. ORDERED: l. Defendant Oravec's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.5 DATED this O?~~ ofJuly, 2014. ~ fl/e4lc/tM ~DON \ United States District Judge 4 (See Doc. 141 at l.) 5 (See Docs. 56; 69; 122.) 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
