Cole et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al, No. 1:2009cv00021 - Document 122 (D. Mont. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED, as set forth in Judge Ostby's F & R. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings respecting the Springfield claims is GRANTED; Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment respecting the Bearcrane claims is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 2/6/2014. (ACL, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cole et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al Doc. 122 IN TilE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR TilE DISTRICT OF MONT ANA FEB 0 6 201~ BILLINGS DIVISION Clerk, u.s. Oistrtct Court OiSlriGt Of Montana Helena EARLINE COLE, as an individual and as personal representative 0 f the ESTATE OF STEVEN BEARCANE, et ai., Plaintiffs, CV 09-21-BLG-SEH ORDER vs. MA TTHEW ORAVEC, in his individual capacity, Defendant. On January 23,2014, United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn S. Ostby entered her Findings and Recommendations l on Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Partial Summary JUdgment. 2 Defendant filed objections on February 4, 2014. 3 The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objections are made. 28 U.S.c. ยง 636(b)(1). I Doc, 119. 2 Doc, 96, 3 Doc, 121. Dockets.Justia.com Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in fulL ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 119) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, as set fOlih in Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendations, as follows: A. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings respecting the Springfield claims is GRANTED. B. Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment respecting the Bearcrane claims is DENIED. DATED this ~ay of February, 2014. United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
