Cline et al v. Schmidt Harvesting, LLC, No. 1:2008cv00086 - Document 9 (D. Mont. 2009)

Court Description: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Jolinda Hill, Jackson Cline, Ramona Cline. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed without prejudice, for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. Objections to F&R due by 3/9/2009. (Hard copy mailed to M. Alback) Signed by Magistrate Carolyn S Ostby on 2/19/2009. (JDH)

Download PDF
Cline et al v. Schmidt Harvesting, LLC Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION RAMONA CLINE, JOLINDA HILL and JACKSON CLINE, CV-08-86-BLG-RFC-CSO Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE vs. SCHMIDT HARVESTING, LLC, a Kansas limited liability company, Defendant. This case was filed in July 2008, but the Complaint was not served on the defendant. In November, the Court allowed Plaintiffs additional time, until January 23, 2009, to serve process on Defendant. See Court’s Doc. No. 7. That Order indicated that no further extensions of time to serve process would be granted. Plaintiffs have not filed proof of service of process. The Local Rules require them to do so. See LR 4.3. On February 10, 2009, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause directing Plaintiffs to appear in writing by February 17, 2009, to show cause why the Court should not recommend that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Court’s Doc. No. 8. Plaintiffs did not respond. Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed, without prejudice, for Plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute. -1- Dockets.Justia.com NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge upon the Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs are advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, any objections to the findings and recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within ten (10) days after receipt hereof, or objection is waived. DATED this 19th day of February, 2009. /S/ Carolyn S. Ostby Carolyn S. Ostby United States Magistrate Judge -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.