Slay v. Brim et al, No. 4:2021cv00254 - Document 10 (E.D. Mo. 2021)

Court Description: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. 4] is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on August 11, 2021. (MCB)

Download PDF
Slay v. Brim et al Doc. 10 Case: 4:21-cv-00254-NAB Doc. #: 10 Filed: 08/11/21 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: 109 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION BENJAMIN GERARD SLAY, Plaintiff, v. CADENA BRIM, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:21-CV-254 NAB OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff moves for appointment of counsel. After considering the motion and the pleadings, the motion is denied without prejudice to refiling at a later time. There is no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in civil cases. Nelson v. Redfield Lithograph Printing, 728 F.2d 1003, 1004 (8th Cir. 1984). In determining whether to appoint counsel, the Court considers several factors, including (1) whether the plaintiff has presented non-frivolous allegations supporting his or her prayer for relief; (2) whether the plaintiff will substantially benefit from the appointment of counsel; (3) whether there is a need to further investigate and present the facts related to the plaintiff’s allegations; and (4) whether the factual and legal issues presented by the action are complex. See Johnson v. Williams, 788 F.2d 1319, 1322-23 (8th Cir. 1986); Nelson, 728 F.2d at 1005. Plaintiff has presented non-frivolous allegations in his complaint. However, he has demonstrated, at this point, that he can adequately present his claims to the Court. Additionally, neither the factual nor the legal issues in this case are complex. The Court will entertain future motions for appointment of counsel as the case progresses. Accordingly, Dockets.Justia.com Case: 4:21-cv-00254-NAB Doc. #: 10 Filed: 08/11/21 Page: 2 of 2 PageID #: 110 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. 4] is DENIED without prejudice. Dated this 11th day of August, 2021. HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.