Gebregziabher v. Slay et al, No. 4:2019cv00470 - Document 10 (E.D. Mo. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 9 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal from the denial of plaintiffs motion for reconsideration would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/15/2019. (AAS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Gebregziabher v. Slay et al Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SIMON GEBREGZIABHER, Plaintiff, v. FRANCIS G. SLAY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:19CV470 SPM OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Simon Gebregziabher’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s September 20, 2019 order of partial dismissal. (Docket No. 9). Specifically, plaintiff is seeking reconsideration of the Court’s dismissal of his official capacity claims against all defendants. Having reviewed the motion, the Court will decline to alter or amend its judgment. Plaintiff’s motion fails to point to any manifest errors of law or fact, or any newly discovered evidence. Instead, the motion merely revisits the same arguments set forth in plaintiff’s complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 9) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal from the denial of plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 15th day of October, 2019. HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
