Reynolds v. Clayton County Sheriff's Department, No. 4:2017cv02343 - Document 14 (E.D. Mo. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, either pay the $5 05 appellate filing fee or file a motion in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/19/2017. (CLO)

Download PDF
Reynolds v. Clayton County Sheriff's Department Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL JAMES REYNOLDS JR., Plaintiff, v. CLAYTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:17CV2343 SPM OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. When the Court dismissed this action, it certified in writing that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. As a result, Court will deny the motion. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, either pay the $505 appellate filing fee or file a motion in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Dated this 19th day of October, 2017. __________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.