Mayfield v. AT&T et al, No. 4:2017cv01418 - Document 19 (E.D. Mo. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to Show Cause to the Court, within 14 days of the date of this order, why the Motion to Dismiss[Doc. No. 16 ] should not be granted. (Show Cause Response due by 9/12/2017.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/29/17. (KJS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mayfield v. AT&T et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MICHELE MAYFIELD, Plaintiff, vs. AT&T, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No: 4:17CV1418 HEA ) ) ) ) OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on it’s own motion. Plaintiff filed complaint on May 1, 2017. Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed informa pauperis on May 2, 2017 [Doc. No. 5]. Thereafter, on June 23, 2017, Defendant AT&T filed A Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 16]. Plaintiff , proceeding pro se, filed a request for additional time in which to respond which was granted by the court on July 10, 2017. In excess of forty (40) days have expired since the grant of additional time and Plaintiff has failed to file a response or opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to Show Cause to the Court, within 14 days of the date of this order, why the Motion to Dismiss[Doc. No. 16] Dockets.Justia.com should not be granted. Dated this 29th day of August, 2017. ________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
