Carter v. USA, No. 4:2016cv01071 - Document 11 (E.D. Mo. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movants motion to stay this action [Doc. # 10 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant shall respond to the Court within thirty (30) days of this Order as to how movant wishes to proceed in this action given the outcome of the Supreme Court case of Beckles v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 886 (2017).( Response to Court due by 5/5/2017.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 4/5/17. (KJS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Carter v. USA Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JUANELL CARTER, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:16CV1071 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is movant’s motion to stay this case. As the action is currently stayed and administratively closed, his motion will be denied as moot. However, movant will be provided an extension of time to notify the Court as to how movant wishes to proceed in this action given the outcome of the Supreme Court case of Beckles v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 886 (2017). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant’s motion to stay this action [Doc. #10] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant shall respond to the Court within thirty (30) days of this Order as to how movant wishes to proceed in this action given the outcome of the Supreme Court case of Beckles v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 886 (2017). Dated this 5th day of April, 2017 ___________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
