Hankins v. Anderson et al, No. 4:2016cv00239 - Document 11 (E.D. Mo. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion for leave to file an amended complaint [ECF No. 10] is DENIED without prejudice. 10 . Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 5/16/16. (CLA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION RONNIE HANKINS, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP ANDERSON, et al., Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:16CV239 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The motion is denied. To obtain leave to file an amended complaint, “a party must submit the proposed amendment along with its motion.” Clayton v. White Hall School Dist., 778 F.2d 457, 460 (8th Cir. 1985); see Wolgin v. Simon, 722 F.2d 389, 395 (8th Cir. 1983) (“Absent some indication as to what might be added to the complaint to make it viable, the [moving party] is not entitled to leave to amend.”). Plaintiff has not submitted a proposed amendment. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint [ECF No. 10] is DENIED without prejudice. Dated this 16th day of May, 2016. HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
