Clearwater Insurance Company v. The Doe Run Resources Company, No. 4:2016cv00195 - Document 318 (E.D. Mo. 2019)

Court Description: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Doe Run's Motion to Dismiss Northbrook Insurance Company's Amended Cross-Claim and AIU Insurance Company's First Amended Cross-Claim, [Doc. No. 233 ], is denied; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Doe Run's Motion to Dismiss First State's Amended Cross-Claims, [Doc. No. 241 ], is denied. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/13/2019. (CLO)

Download PDF
Clearwater Insurance Company v. The Doe Run Resources Company Doc. 318 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CLEARWATER INSURANCE COMPANY and EVEREST REINSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 4:16CV195 HEA ) THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION ) f/k/a ST. JOE MINERALS CORPORATION, AIU ) INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST STATE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, GOVERNMENT ) EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, ) NORTHBROOK INSURANCE COMPANY, and ) ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant the Doe Run Resources Corporation’s (“Doe Run”) Motion to Dismiss Northbrook Insurance Company’s Amended Cross-Claim and AIU Insurance Company’s First Amended CrossClaim, [Doc. No. 233], and Motion to Dismiss First State’s Amended CrossClaims, [Doc. No. 241]. The respective parties have filed oppositions to these motions. The Motions will be denied. On March 3, 2017 and June 11, 2018, the Court entered its Opinion, Memorandum and Orders addressing the issues that are raised in the current Dockets.Justia.com Motions. For the reasons previously set forth in those Orders, the Motions are again denied. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Doe Run’s Motion to Dismiss Northbrook Insurance Company’s Amended Cross-Claim and AIU Insurance Company’s First Amended Cross-Claim, [Doc. No. 233], is denied; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Doe Run’s Motion to Dismiss First State’s Amended Cross-Claims, [Doc. No. 241], is denied. Dated this day 13th of March, 2019. ___________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.