Rodgers v. Steele, No. 4:2013cv02000 - Document 25 (E.D. Mo. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner file his reply /traverse to the Respondent's Response To Order To Show Cause Why a Writ of Habeas Corpus Should Not be Granted [ Doc. 7 ] within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/17/16. (KXS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rodgers v. Steele Doc. 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CORNELIUS RODGERS, Petitioner, vs. TROY STEELE, ) ) ) ) ) Case No: 4:13CV2000HEA ) ) ) Respondent. OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Petitioner filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. 1] on October 7, 2013. On December 6, 2013, Defendant filed his Response To Order To Show Cause Why a Writ of Habeas Corpus Should Not be Granted [ Doc. 7]. Thereafter, on February 25, 2016 , Petitioner filed MEMORANDUM AND NOTICE OF IMMINENT FILING [Doc. 21]. On September 15, 2016 this court denied the relief sought by Petitioner in his MEMORANDUM AND NOTICE OF IMMINENT FILING. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner file his reply /traverse to the Respondent’s Response To Order To Show Cause Why a Writ of Habeas Corpus Should Not be Granted [ Doc. 7] within 30 days of the date of this order. Dockets.Justia.com Dated this 17th day of November, 2016. ________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
