Rice v. Unitrin Data Systems, No. 4:2011cv01702 - Document 59 (E.D. Mo. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 57 ] is granted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is dismissed. Case Closed. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 07/22/2014. (CLK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION AMIE RICE, Plaintiff, v. UNITRIN DATA SYSTEM, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:11CV1702 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant s Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 57]. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. For the reasons set forth in the motion and below, the Motion is granted. On March 9, 2012, the Court granted Defendant s Motion to Stay Action and Compel Arbitration. On October 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed an Amended Demand for Arbitration which specifically incorporated the Complaint filed in this action into AAA Arbitration Case No. 58 160 00204 12, which had been previously initiated by Defendant. Defendant advises the Court that the parties engaged in final, binding arbitration on March 3-5, 2014. On May 16, 2014, the Arbitrator in this matter issued an Opinion and Award. Defendant further advises the Court that the Opinion and Award resolves all matters raised by Plaintiff in her Complaint and Amended Demand for Arbitration. Plaintiff has filed nothing to controvert Defendant s representations. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant s Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 57] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is dismissed. Dated this 22nd day of July, 2014. _______________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.