Large v. Astrue, No. 4:2010cv00142 - Document 28 (E.D. Mo. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 27 ) is adopted and incorporated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Reverse and Remand and for Entry of Final Judgment (Doc. No. 26 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with theMagistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and with this Order. A separate Order of Remand shall accompany this Order. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 3/17/11. (copy of this order and 27 R&R mailed to Social Security Administration) (TRC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Large v. Astrue Doc. 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JOHN W. LARGE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff(s), vs. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant(s). Case No. 4:10CV142 JCH ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Reverse and Remand and for Entry of Final Judgment, filed February 16, 2011. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles, who issued a Report and Recommendation on March 2, 2011. Magistrate Judge Buckles recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Reverse and Remand and for Entry of Final Judgment. Magistrate Judge Buckles further recommends that the Court reverse and remand this matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. After review of the entire record in this matter, the Court concurs in the Magistrate Judge’s findings, and will adopt the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court will grant Defendant’s Motion to Reverse and Remand and for Entry of Final Judgment, and reverse and remand this matter to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Specifically, the Administrative Law Judge will be directed to more thoroughly analyze Plaintiff’s subjective complaints, and to specifically evaluate the medical source opinion evidence, including the opinions of Dr. Head, Dr. Kriegshauser, and Dr. Volarich. Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 27) is adopted and incorporated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Reverse and Remand and for Entry of Final Judgment (Doc. No. 26) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and with this Order. A separate Order of Remand shall accompany this Order. Dated this 17th day of March, 2011. /s/ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
