Carroll v. Sisco, et al, No. 4:2000cv00864 - Document 263 (E.D. Mo. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -- IT IS ORDERED 1. Defendants Michael Sisco, Keith Coleman, and Michael McCann's motion to reconsider this court's denial of summary judgment disposing of plaintiff's claims against them 229 is gr anted. 2. Defendants Michael Sisco, Keith Coleman, and Michael McCann's motions for summry judgment 190 193 are granted in full. 3. Defendants Brian Dolan, Charles Johnson, Jerry Leyshock, Harry Hegger, Ronnie Henderson, and the St. Louis Boa rd of Police Commissioners motion to grant summary judgment in their favor on all of plaintiff's claims against them 230 is granted in part and denied in part as set forth above. 4. Plaintiff's motion to reconsider this court's grant of summary judgment in favor of all University City defendants 232 is denied. 5. Plaintiff's motion to reconsider this court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant St. Louis City 233 is denied. 6. Plaintiff's request to reconsider this court's denial of plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel 240 is denied. 7. Plaintiff's motion to produce documents 244 is denied. 8. Plaintiff's motions to compel discovery 250 258 are denied. 9. Plaintiff&# 039;s motion to reconsider this court's determinations on the facts and on plaintiff's discovery requests 257 is denied. 10. The motions of defendants St. Louis City Police Department and Brian Dolan, Harry Hegger, Ronnie Henderson, Charl es Johnson, and Jerry Leyshock to extend time to respond to plaintiff's motions to compel 252 253 are denied. 11. The motion of defendants St. Louis City Police Department and Brian Dolan, Harry Hegger, Ronnie Henderson, Charles Johnson, and Jerry Leyshock to respond out of time to plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 261 is granted. 12. The clerk shall not accept for filing and no party shall file any further motions for reconsideration without the court first authorizing any such filing. Signed by Honorable Charles B. Kornmann on 9/30/11. (KCM)