Lesley v. Teague et al, No. 2:2015cv00059 - Document 44 (E.D. Mo. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to update the docket sheet [ECF No. 41 ] is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk is directed to terminate Jane Does 2-7 and to add defendants Stacy Mosley, Kala Hunt er, Mary Mills, and Jeremy Trustee to the docket sheet.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Stacy Mosley, Kala Hunter, Mary Mills, and Jeremy Trustee are DISMISSED without prejudice.An Order of Partial Dismissal will be filed separately., Stacy Mosley, Kala Hunter, Mary Mills and Jeremy Trustee added. Jane Does 2-7 terminated.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 01/20/2016. (CLK)
Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION RICHARD W. LESLEY, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN TEAGUE, et al., Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:15CV59 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff moves the Court to update the docket sheet to replace the Jane Doe defendants with their full names. These defendants are Stacy Mosley, Kala Hunter, Mary Mills, and Jeremy Trustee. The motion is granted. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that he was pepper sprayed by a correctional officer and was not allowed to wash for four days. Plaintiff’s claim against Mosley, Hunter, Mills, and Trustee is that they ignored his requests for medical aid during those four days. However, he has not made specific factual allegations that would allow the Court to determine which defendant or defendants violated his rights. This is impermissible. The complaint must state how each individual defendant contributed to the constitutional violation. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 676 (2009) (“Because vicarious liability is inapplicable to Bivens and § 1983 suits, a plaintiff must plead that each Government-official defendant, through the official’s own individual actions, has violated the Constitution.”). As a result, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as to each of these defendants, and they must be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to update the docket sheet [ECF No. 41] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk is directed to terminate Jane Does 2-7 and to add defendants Stacy Mosley, Kala Hunter, Mary Mills, and Jeremy Trustee to the docket sheet. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Stacy Mosley, Kala Hunter, Mary Mills, and Jeremy Trustee are DISMISSED without prejudice. An Order of Partial Dismissal will be filed separately. Dated this 20th day of January, 2016. HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.