Endicott v. Hurley et al, No. 2:2014cv00107 - Document 12 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motions for extension of time [ECF No. 8 , 10 ] are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to amend judgment [ECF No. 9 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/22/15. (KJS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Endicott v. Hurley et al Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION FRANKLIN G. ENDICOTT, Plaintiff, v. JAMES HURLEY, et al., Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:14CV107 DDN OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment and motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint. The motion for reconsideration lacks merit. However, the Court will allow plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is warned that the filing of an amended complaint replaces the original complaint, and claims that are not realleged are deemed abandoned. E.g., In re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees Litigation, 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005). Plaintiff must file his amended complaint no later than February 27, 2015. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for extension of time [ECF No. 8, 10] are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to amend judgment [ECF No. 9] is DENIED. Dated this 22nd day of January, 2015. HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
