Biggerstaff v. Astrue, No. 2:2011cv00068 - Document 17 (E.D. Mo. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David D. Noce 14 , filed January 18, 2011 be and is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that the defendant's motion to reverse and remand and for entry of final judgment [12 ] be and is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner denying the plaintiff's application for disability benefits be a nd is REVERSED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 14 . This Court does not retain jurisdiction of this case. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/29/12. (MRS)

Download PDF
Biggerstaff v. Astrue Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION NANCY BIGGERSTAFF, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.2:11CV68SNLJ/DDN ) Defendant. ) ORDER AND JUDGMENT Having received no objections thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David D. Noce [14], filed January 18, 2011 be and is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to reverse and remand and for entry of final judgment [12 ] be and is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner denying the plaintiff’s application for disability benefits be and is REVERSED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [14]. This Court does not retain jurisdiction of this case. Dockets.Justia.com Dated this 29th day of March, 2012. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.