Trice v. Rodgers et al, No. 1:2018cv00207 - Document 39 (E.D. Mo. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION MEMORANDUM re: 35 MOTION for Issuance Subpoena for Witness and Evidence filed by Plaintiff Richard Matthew Trice, 37 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 DCM Complaint filed by Plaintiff Richard Matthew Trice: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Subpoena for Witness and Evidence, [Doc. No. 35] and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint and Statements, [Doc. No. 37]. Plaintiff does not provide a certificate of service on Defendant. The Court, t herefore assumes Defendant did not receive these pleadings. Plaintiff is essentially seeking discovery. At this point, it is unclear whether Defendant will provide the requested information as part of his required disclosures and in response to Pla intiff's requests. The Motions are denied without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall forward these pleadings to Defendant. Defendant shall respond to the pleadings either through providing Plaintiff with the information requested or by moving the Court for appropriate action. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 08/11/20. (CMH)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.