Houghton v. United States, No. 5:2004cv00271 - Document 100 (S.D. Miss. 2008)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT Dismissing Case. Further Ordered that plaintiff's claims for negligence and negligence per se are dismissed without prejudice. Further Ordered that any remaining motions pending in this matter should be denied as moot. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 2/1/08 (MGB) Modified on 2/5/2008 (PKM).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Houghton v. United States Doc. 100 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI, WESTERN DIVISION HENDERSON DuVAL HOUGHTON, #55194-004 VERSUS PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:04cv271-DCB-JCS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEFENDANT FINAL JUDGMENT This matter having come before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [docket entry no. 96] of Magistrate Judge James C. Sumner, the Court having adopted said Report and Recommendation in full and having jurisdiction over determined the that plaintiff’s it lacks claims for subject matter negligence and negligence per se, and there being no other claims for relief remaining before the Court; accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the case is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff’s claims for negligence and negligence per se are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that any remaining motions pending in this matter should be DENIED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 1st day of February 2008. s/ David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
