Rankins v. Ms. Dept. of Corrections et al, No. 1:2016cv00419 - Document 14 (S.D. Miss. 2017)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that Plaintiff's 1983 claims are dismissed with prejudice. Ordered that this dismissal counts as a strike. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 4/6/17. (JCH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rankins v. Ms. Dept. of Corrections et al Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION COREY LEON RANKINS, #141674 PLAINTIFF v. CAUSE NO. 1:16-cv-419-LG-RHW MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ALICIA BOX DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued this date and incorporated herein by reference, IT IS, HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Rankins’s habeas corpus claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Rankins’s pursuit of those claims in his pending habeas corpus case, Rankins v. MDOC, 1:17-cv-74-HSOLRA (S.D. Miss.). IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Rankins’s § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(ii). IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this dismissal will count as a “strike” in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 6th day of April, 2017. s/ Louis Guirola, Jr. LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
