Brown v. Davis et al, No. 1:2016cv00241 - Document 25 (S.D. Miss. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to all claims and defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 11/9/16. (JCH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brown v. Davis et al Doc. 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION ANTONIO S. BROWN PLAINTIFF VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16CV241-RHW HUBERT DAVIS et al DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the requirement for the filing of a separate document pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a), and based on the reasons set forth in the Order of Dismissal entered by this Court, the Court hereby enters its Final Judgment in the abovecaptioned matter. Upon review of the pleadings, the allegations in Plaintiff’s complaint, and Plaintiff’s testimony at a screening hearing conducted on October 27, 2016, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint shall count as a strike. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff is cautioned that if he acquires three or more strikes, he shall be barred from proceeding IFP unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all claims and all defendants. SO ORDERED, this the 9th day of November, 2016. /s/ Robert H. Walker ROBERT H. WALKER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
