Shariff v. Evans et al, No. 1:2016cv00131 - Document 60 (S.D. Miss. 2017)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 9/12/17. (JCH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Shariff v. Evans et al Doc. 60 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION ABDUL AL-MUMIT ASAD SHARIFF v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv131-HSO-JCG RODERICK EVANS, et al. DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT This matter came on to be heard on the Report and Recommendation [57] of United States Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo, entered in this case on August 9, 2017; the Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies [45] filed by Defendants Roderick Evans, Latrina Gamble, and Jaclynn Johnson on May 8, 2017; and the Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies [51] filed by Defendant Nurse Dawn M. Brown on June 2, 2017. The Court, after a full review and consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [57], Defendants’ Motions [45], [51], the record as a whole, and relevant legal authority, finds that in accord with its Order entered herewith, IT IS, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that this civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 12th day of September, 2017. s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
