Smith v. Williams et al, No. 1:2016cv00084 - Document 91 (S.D. Miss. 2017)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that, Plaintiffs claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 against Pearl River County, Mississippi aredismissed with prejudice, and Plaintiffs claims against Rob Williams and his state law claims against Pearl River County, Mississippi are dismissed without prejudice; and Ordered that Plaintiff is assessed a strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 8/17/17. (RLW)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Smith v. Williams et al Doc. 91 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION RODNEY SMITH PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-84-JCG ROB WILLIAMS, et al. DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL In accordance with the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on August 17, 2017 dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 against Pearl River County, Mississippi, and dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff’s claims against Rob Williams and his state law claims against Pearl River County, Mississippi, this civil action against Defendants Rob Williams and Pearl River County, Mississippi should be dismissed. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 against Pearl River County, Mississippi are dismissed with prejudice, and Plaintiff’s claims against Rob Williams and his state law claims against Pearl River County, Mississippi are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is assessed a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). SO ORDERED this the 17th day of August, 2017. s/ John C. Gargiulo JOHN C. GARGIULO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
