Comeger et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al, No. 1:2016cv00013 - Document 18 (S.D. Miss. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 5/24/16. (Whitsitt, K)

Download PDF
Comeger et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION DWAYNE COMEGER and JOYCE COMEGER v. PLAINTIFFS CAUSE NO. 1:16CV13-LG-RHW WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., MORRIS & ASSOCIATES, and EMILY KAYE COURTEAU DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS BEFORE THE COURT is the Motion to Dismiss [15] filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Pro se plaintiffs Dwayne and Joyce Comeger allege that the defendants wrongfully foreclosed on property they owned in Carriere, Mississippi, despite notice that the property was protected by a bankruptcy stay. In this Motion, Wells Fargo contends that the bankruptcy case was filed by the Nanotek Group Irrevocable Trust, an entity that did not own the property, and therefore foreclosure of the Carriere property was not prevented by the bankruptcy stay. The plaintiffs have not responded and the deadline for doing so has passed. The Court recently considered and granted a motion to dismiss filed by defendants Morris & Associates and Emily Kaye Courteau based on identical arguments. (See Mem. Op. & Order Granting Mot. to Dismiss, Apr. 19, 2016, ECF No. 13). Because the current Motion does not require the Court to consider different facts, legal arguments, or supporting documentation, the findings and conclusions of the earlier order will be incorporated herein by reference. For the reasons stated in the earlier order, the plaintiffs fail to allege facts showing a plausible claim of violation of the bankruptcy stay or wrongful foreclosure against Dockets.Justia.com Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Dismiss [15] filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ claims against this defendant are DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 24th day of May 2016. s\ Louis Guirola, Jr. Louis Guirola, Jr. Chief U.S. District Judge -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.