Cruse v. Brisolara et al, No. 1:2015cv00172 - Document 122 (S.D. Miss. 2016)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that this case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted due to Plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and is to count as a strike. In the alternative only, the case is dismissed for Plaintiffs failure to set forth specific facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 9/16/16. (RLW)

Download PDF
Cruse v. Brisolara et al Doc. 122 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION ANDREW CLINTON CRUSE, JR. VERSUS PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv172-RHW MELVIN T. BRISOLARA, et al. DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the requirement for a separate document by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58(a) and based on the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered by the Court this date, the Court hereby enters its Final Judgment in the above-captioned matter. It is ordered that this case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted due to Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and is to count as a strike. In the alternative only, the case is dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to set forth specific facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial. SO ORDERED, this the 16th day of September, 2016. /s/ Robert H. Walker ROBERT H. WALKER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.