Ross v. Byrd, No. 1:2015cv00093 - Document 44 (S.D. Miss. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: Plaintiff Antonio Ross's claims against Defendant Thomas Byrd, in his individual capacity, are Dismissed with Prejudice. This civil action is Dismissed with Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 8/30/2016 (wld)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ross v. Byrd Doc. 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION ANTONIO ROSS v. THOMAS BYRD, in his individual capacity § § § § § § § § PLAINTIFF Civil Action No. 1:15cv93-HSO-JCG DEFENDANT FINAL JUDGMENT The claims of Plaintiff Antonio Ross against Defendant Thomas Byrd, in his individual capacity, came on for trial before the Court and a jury on the 29th day of August, 2016, and concluded on the 30th day of August, 2016, Honorable Halil Suleyman Ozerden, United States District Judge, presiding. The issues having been duly tried and having heard all of the evidence and argument of counsel and receiving instructions of the Court, including a Special Verdict Form, the jury retired to consider the verdict. The jury returned upon their oaths, into open Court, a unanimous verdict, finding in favor of Defendant Thomas Byrd, in his individual capacity. In accordance with the jury’s unanimous verdict, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Plaintiff Antonio Ross’s claims against Defendant Thomas Byrd, in his individual capacity, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. -1- Dockets.Justia.com IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 30th day of August, 2016. s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
