Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Polk et al, No. 1:2014cv00136 - Document 78 (S.D. Miss. 2015)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company as to Count 1 of its Complaint for Declaratory Judgment. This civil action is dismissed with prejudice. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 10/23/15. (RLW)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Polk et al Doc. 78 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION NATIONWIDE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. JAMEILYA POLK; FOCUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC; SEAN PEDERSON; ABC INDIVIDUALS; And XYZ ENTITIES § PLAINTIFF § § § § CIVIL NO.: 1:14cv136-HSO-RHW § § § DEFENDANTS § § § FINAL JUDGMENT This matter came on to be heard upon the Motion for (Partial) Judgment on the Pleadings [41] filed by Plaintiff Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company. The Court, after a full review and consideration of the pleadings on file, the record as a whole, and relevant legal authorities, finds that in accord with its Order entered herewith, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that judgment is rendered in favor of Plaintiff Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company as to Count I of its Complaint for Declaratory Judgment [1]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, the Court declares that the terms and conditions of the Nationwide Policy clearly and unambiguously relieve it of any duty to provide liability coverage, including defense and/or indemnification, for Defendant Focus Construction, LLC, for any and all claims made by Defendant Jameilya Polk in the Underlying Action. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 23rd day of October, 2015. s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
