Moran v. Reddix et al, No. 1:2013cv00111 - Document 79 (S.D. Miss. 2014)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT/ORDER granting 70 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 72 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 75 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Roper on 6/9/14. (JCH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Moran v. Reddix et al Doc. 79 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION DONALD E. MORAN, #171514 PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv111-JMR DR. REDDIX and MARCUS THORN DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment [70, 72] and the Plaintiff’s Motion [75] for Summary Judgment. In accordance with the requirement for a separate document by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58(a) and based on the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered by the Court this date, the Court hereby enters its Final Judgment in the above-captioned matter. It is therefore, ORDERED that Defendants’ Dr. Reddix and Marcus Thorn, Motions [70, 72] for Summary Judgment be, and are hereby granted. It is further, ORDERED that this Civil Action is hereby dismissed with prejudice against Dr. Reddix and Marcus Thorn, whether advanced under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or state law in both their individual and official capacities. It is further, ORDERED that Moran’s Motion [75] for Summary Judgment be, and is hereby denied. It is further, ORDERED that each party bear their respective costs associated with these motions. This the 9th day of June, 2014. CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
