-RHW Carl E. Woodward, LLC. et al v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al, No. 1:2009cv00781 - Document 379 (S.D. Miss. 2012)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that the Plaintiffs shall recover from the Defendants a total Judgment of $999,144.79. Ordered that the Plaintiffs shall recover from the Defendant post-judgment interest at the rate of 0.18% on the entire Judgment from the date of the entry of Final Judgment until paid. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 5/3/12. (JCH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-RHW Carl E. Woodward, LLC. et al v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al Doc. 379 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION CARL E. WOODWARD, LLC, and GRAY INSURANCE CO. v. PLAINTIFFS CAUSE NO. 1:09CV781-HSO-RHW ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order [200] entered on January 12, 2011, the Order [248] granting Partial Judgment as a Matter of Law entered on March 23, 2011, the jury verdict returned on March 23, 2011, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law announced on the record on February 23, 2012, and the Memorandum Opinion and Order [378] entered contemporaneously herewith, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, Plaintiffs Carl E. Woodward, LLC, and Gray Insurance Company shall recover from Defendant Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company compensatory damages in the amount of $482,026.46, and extra-contractual damages in the amount of $517,118.33, for a total Judgment of $999,144.79. IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, Plaintiffs Carl E. Woodward, LLC, and Gray Insurance Company shall recover from Defendant Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company post-judgment interest at the rate of 0.18% Dockets.Justia.com on the entire Judgment from the date of the entry of Final Judgment until paid, as prescribed by 28 U.S.C. ยง 1961. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 3rd day of May, 2012. s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
