Ali v. Epps, No. 1:2009cv00693 - Document 13 (S.D. Miss. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER overruling petitioner's 11 Objection; granting 6 Motion to Dismiss; and adopting Report and Recommendations re 9 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 11/15/11 (RLW)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
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
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
