Magruder et al v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company, No. 1:2007cv00564 - Document 241 (S.D. Miss. 2009)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CERTAIN MOTIONS IN LIMINE granting Plaintiffs' 220 Motion in Limine to exclude any reference to any possible effect a verdict against the defendant may have on insurance premium rates; granting Pla intiffs' 221 Motion in Limine to exclude evidence relating to a grant provided by the Mississippi Development Authority; granting Defendant's 228 Motion in Limine to exclude any reference to the loss reserves it has established. Signed by Senior Judge L. T. Senter, Jr, on 02/03/2009 (kbo)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS D. MAGRUDER and VIRGINIA CARRINGTON MAGRUDER V. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO.1:07CV564 LTS-RHW AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CERTAIN MOTIONS IN LIMINE The Court has before it the following motions: 1. Plaintiffs motion [221] in limine to exclude evidence relating to a grant provided by the Mississippi Development Authority. 2. Plaintiffs motion [220] in limine to exclude any reference to any possible effect a verdict against the defendant may have on insurance premium rates. 3. Defendant s motion [228] in limine to exclude any reference to the loss reserves established by the defendant. These motions will be granted. Any grant that may have been obtained by the plaintiffs through the Mississippi Development Authority is not relevant to the issues that will be decided at trial. Any possible effect a verdict against the defendant may have on the calculation of insurance premiums is not relevant to the issues that will be decided at trial. The defendant s having established a loss reserve and the amount of that reserve are not relevant to the issues that will be decided at trial. Accordingly, it is ORDERED That Plaintiffs motion [221] in limine to exclude evidence relating to a grant provided by the Mississippi Development Authority is GRANTED; That Plaintiffs motion [220] in limine to exclude any reference to any possible effect a verdict against the defendant may have on insurance premium rates is GRANTED; and That Defendant s motion [228] in limine to exclude any reference to the loss reserves it has established is GRANTED. SO ORDERED this 3rd day of February, 2009. s/ L. T. Senter, Jr. L. T. SENTER, JR. SENIOR JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
