Horridge v. Keystone Lines, Inc. et al, No. 1:2006cv01226 - Document 86 (S.D. Miss. 2008)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Gerard Horridge, Judith Horridge against Keystone Lines, Inc., Richard Williams. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 10/8/08. (wld)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Horridge v. Keystone Lines, Inc. et al Doc. 86 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION GERARD HORRIDGE and JUDITH HORRIDGE V. KEYSTONE LINES, INC., and RICHARD WILLIAMS § § § § § § § PLAINTIFFS Civil No. 1:06CV1226-HSO-JMR DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT This action came on for trial before the Court and a jury on the 6th day of October, 2008, and concluded on the 8th day of October, 2008, Honorable Halil Suleyman Ozerden, United States District Judge, presiding, and the issues having been duly tried and the jury having heard all of the evidence and argument of counsel and receiving instructions of the Court, including a Special Verdict Form, retired to consider their verdict and return upon their oaths, into open Court, the following unanimous verdict, to wit: Question Number One: Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that the motor vehicle collision was proximately caused by the negligence of Defendant Richard Williams? Please answer yes or no: YES If you answered "yes" to Question Number One, please proceed to Question Number Two. If you answered "no" to Question Number One, please proceed to Part II on the last page. Dockets.Justia.com Question Number Two: What amount of money, if any, would adequately compensate each of the plaintiffs for his or her injuries, if any? Answer in dollars and cents, if any, or answer "none." a. Gerard Horridge $ $3,618.50 b. Judith Horridge $1,795.50 $ Proceed to Question Number Three. Question Number Three: Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that the negligence of Plaintiff Gerard Horridge, if any, caused or contributed to the cause of the motor vehicle collision in this case? Please answer yes or no: YES If you answered "yes" to Question Number Three, please proceed to Question Number Four. If you answered "no" to Question Number Three, please proceed to Part II on the last page. Question Number Four: What percentage of fault do you attribute to the negligence of each responsible party? Defendants 20 % Plaintiff Gerard Horridge 80 % (Total must equal 100%) Proceed to Part II on the last page. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Plaintiff Gerard Horridge shall recover from Defendants Keystone Lines, Inc., and Richard 2 Williams, compensatory damages in the total amount of $723.70. IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Plaintiff Judith Horridge shall recover from Defendants Keystone Lines, Inc., and Richard Williams, compensatory damages in the total amount of $359.10. IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that in accordance with the prior rulings of this Court, all claims against Defendant Sunbelt Foods are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and all claims against Defendant Keystone Logistics are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 8th day of October, 2008. s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
