Hamilton v. Saul, No. 3:2020cv00012 - Document 17 (N.D. Miss. 2020)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Andrew Saul against Shari Hamilton. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 10/26/20. (ncb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hamilton v. Saul Doc. 17 Case: 3:20-cv-00012-JMV Doc #: 17 Filed: 10/26/20 1 of 1 PageID #: 557 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION SHARI HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No.: 3:20cv00012-JMV FINAL JUDGMENT This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding an application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Court, having reviewed the record, the administrative transcript, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law and having heard oral argument, finds as follows, to wit: For the reasons stated in Defendant’s brief and announced by the Court on the record at the conclusion of oral argument during a hearing held today, the Court finds there is no reversible error, and the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Therefore, the decision of the Commissioner is hereby AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 26th day of October, 2020. /s/ Jane M. Virden U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
