Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2014cv00159 - Document 15 (N.D. Miss. 2015)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Gregory Hughes against Commissioner of Social Security. The case is remanded for further proceedings. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 3/26/15. (ncb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION GREGORY HUGHES PLAINTIFF V. NO. 3:14CV00159-JMV COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT FINAL JUDGMENT This cause is before the court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying claims for a period of disability and Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The court, having reviewed the administrative record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law and having heard oral argument, finds as follows, to-wit: Consistent with the court’s ruling from the bench during oral argument, the court finds the ALJ’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”) determination is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Specifically, the ALJ failed–though attributing great weight to the medical source statement of Dr. Bruce Randolph–to include in the claimant’s RFC Dr. Randolph’s assessment that the claimant could only stand for fifteen minutes without interruption and sit forty-five minutes without interruption. Thus, the ALJ effectively rejected these limitations without any explanation. Additionally, the court finds nothing in the record to indicate the ALJ considered what effect, if any, the claimant’s polycystic kidney disease–documented by a September 2013 MRI–had on his ability to work. On remand, the ALJ Dockets.Justia.com shall consider the claimant’s polycystic kidney disease and determine what effect, if any, it has on the claimant’s ability to perform work activity. Also, the ALJ shall reconsider Dr. Randolph’s opinion and either adopt the standing and sitting limitations noted above or fully explain why they should not be adopted. After considering all of the evidence, the ALJ shall reconsider the claimant’s RFC. If necessary, the ALJ shall obtain additional testimony from a vocational expert in order to determine whether there is any work the claimant can perform in light of his RFC and other important vocational factors. The ALJ may conduct any additional proceedings that are not inconsistent with this order. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings. This, the 26th day of March, 2015. /s/ Jane M. Virden U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
