Johnson et al v. Mitcham, No. 3:2008cv00050 - Document 74 (N.D. Miss. 2010)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 9/23/2010. (pls, USDC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Johnson et al v. Mitcham Doc. 74 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION WAYNCE C. JOHNSON, JR. and KENNETH A. RUTHERFORD, VS. PLAINTIFFS, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08CV50-P-S ROBERT MITCHAM, DEFENDANT. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with a Memorandum Opinion issued this day, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: (1) The plaintiffs’ May 10, 2010 motion for summary judgment [68] is GRANTED based in part on the reasons set forth in the court’s Memorandum Opinion and in part on the defendant’s total failure to respond to the motion. To defeat a motion for summary judgment, the non-movant must demonstrate through a response that there is at least one genuine issue of material fact that warrants a trial to determine the contested fact or facts. As of today, over four months after the filing of the motion for summary judgment, the defendant has failed to file a response to the motion for summary judgment, nor has he contacted the court for additional time to do so. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $334,000.00; (3) This case is CLOSED. SO ORDERED this the 23rd day of September, A.D., 2010. /s/ W. Allen Pepper, Jr. W. ALLEN PEPPER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
