Beck, et al v. Koppers Industries,, et al, No. 3:2003cv00060 - Document 1307 (N.D. Miss. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion in case 3:04-cv-00160-WAP-JAD; GRANTING (1254) Defendant Illinois Central Railroad Company's Motion for Summary Judgment in case 3:03-cv-00060-WAP-JAD. DISMISSING with prejudice claims of Alice Hill on behalf of David Hill against Illinois Central. Parties to show cause within 30 days why this ruling should not apply to the other plaintiffs. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 10/20/2009. Associated Cases: 3:03-cv-00060-WAP-JAD, 3:04-cv-00160-WAP-JAD (pbs, USDC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION ALICE HILL on behalf of the estate of DAVID HILL, Deceased, ET AL., VS. PLAINTIFFS, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:03CV060-P-D ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with a Memorandum Opinion issued this day, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: (1) Defendant Illinois Central Railroad Company s motion for summary judgment [1254] on the claims of Alice Hill on behalf of David Hill is GRANTED; accordingly, (2) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), since there is no just reason for delay, the claims of Alice Hill on behalf of David Hill against Illinois Central are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (3) The parties are instructed to show cause within 30 days of entry of this Final Judgment why this ruling should not apply to the other plaintiffs in this action and the related actions. SO ORDERED this the 20th day of October, A.D., 2009. /s/ W. Allen Pepper, Jr. W. ALLEN PEPPER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
