Grosch v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al, No. 2:2006cv00204 - Document 144 (N.D. Miss. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion denying 139 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 139 Motion for New Trial. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 1/22/2009. (pbs, USDC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION ADAM GROSCH, VS. PLAINTIFF, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV204-P-A TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; TUNICA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF DORNAE MOSBY; and HWCC-TUNICA, INC.; DEFENDANTS. ORDER In accordance with a Memorandum Opinion issued this day, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that HWCC-Tunica, Inc. s renewed motion for a judgment as a matter of law, or alternatively, motion for new trial, or alternatively, motion for remittitur [139] are DENIED. SO ORDERED this the 22nd day of January, A.D., 2008. /s/ W. Allen Pepper, Jr. W. ALLEN PEPPER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
