-DAS Stafford v. City of West Point, Mississippi et al, No. 1:2011cv00013 - Document 34 (N.D. Miss. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION re 33 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 7/7/2011. (psk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION NATALIE STAFFORD, as conservator of Richard Stafford V. PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO.: 1:11CV13-SA-JAD CITY OF WEST POINT, MISSISSIPPI, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC, filed a Motion to Dismiss with its Answer and Defenses [16]. Defendant asserts that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against this Defendant as Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC, neither owns nor operates the establishment known as The Pony in West Point, Mississippi. Therefore, Defendant asserts, it cannot be held liable for any torts or wrongs associated with that entity. Motion to Dismiss Standard Under Rule 12(b)(6), the court accepts all well-pleaded facts as true, viewing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Martin K. Eby Constr. Co. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 369 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir. 2004) (quoting Jones v. Greninger, 188 F.3d 322, 324 (5th Cir. 1999)). To overcome a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, Plaintiffs must plead enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 167 L. Ed. 2d 929 (2007). That demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, --- U.S. ---, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949, 173 L. Ed. 2d 868 (2009). Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level, on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true (even if doubtful in fact). Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555, 127 S. Ct. 1955 (citations and footnote omitted). A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. at 1949. It follows that where the well-pleaded facts do not permit the court to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct, the complaint has alleged but it has not show[n] that the pleader is entitled to relief. Id. at 1950 (quoting FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a)(2)). Discussion and Analysis The Complaint alleges that Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC, as owner and operator of The Pony, owed a duty of reasonable care to Richard Stafford as a business invitee, and further had the duty not to violate the law by selling or serving alcoholic beverages to a minor, including Richard Stafford. Defendant Mississippi Adult Companies presents an affidavit from Charles G. Westlund, Jr. Westlund avers knowledge that the business located at 515 Highway 45 Alternate North, Suite A, West Point, Mississippi 39773, known as The Pony, is owned and operated by the entity known as MEC, Inc., of which he is a stockholder. He further explains that Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC, is a separate entity from MEC, Inc. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. Therefore, based on the uncontested facts presented to this Court, Defendant Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC, s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff has failed to plead factual content that allows the Court to reasonably infer that the Defendant Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC, is liable for the misconduct alleged. See Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. at 1949. Because the Court cannot infer that Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC, is liable, the complaint has failed to show that the pleader is entitled to relief. FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a)(2). 2 Conclusion Defendant Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC s Motion to Dismiss [16] is GRANTED. Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC, is therefore, dismissed as a party defendant. SO ORDERED, this the 7th day of July, 2011. /s/ Sharion Aycock U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.