Jennings #213611 v. Bergh et al, No. 2:2006cv00001 - Document 31 (W.D. Mich. 2008)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 29 re 21 , 16 : Defendants Hursh, Bergh, Rapelje, Jones, Immel, Rife, and Wickstrom's motion for summary judgment 16 is GRANTED and said defendants are DISMISSED; Defendant Berg's motion for summary judgment 21 is DENIED; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION FLOYD JENNINGS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:06-cv-1 HON. GORDON J. QUIST UNKNOWN BERGH, et al., Defendants. __________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket #29) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. 2. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Hursh, Bergh, Rapelje, Jones, Immel, Rife and Wickstrom (Docket #16) is GRANTED and defendants Hursh, Bergh, Rapelje, Jones, Immel, Rife and Wickstrom are DISMISSED from this action. 3. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Berg (Docket #21) is DENIED. Dated: September 29, 2008 /s/ Gordon J. Quist GORDON J. QUIST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
