Popp v. Lakeshore Foods Corp., No. 1:2017cv00710 - Document 27 (W.D. Mich. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION; Order to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Popp v. Lakeshore Foods Corp. Doc. 27 See Moore v. Rohm & Haas Co Dockets.Justia.com Helder v. Hitachi Power Tools, Ltd. id. see also Reese v. CNH Am. LLC Moore v. Rohm & Haas Co. Moses v. Bus. Card Exp., Inc. Perceptron, Inc. v. Silicon Video, Inc. see also Steelcase, Inc. v. Smart Techs., Inc. Smart Techs. Id. Factor 1 – Convenience of the Witnesses e.g. Pilates Inc. v. Pilates Inst. Fed. Elec. Prods. Co. v. Frank Adam Elec. Co. key See id. see also Thomas v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. id. id See AutoWares, LLC v. Wisconsin River Co-op Servs. Steelcase, Inc. v. Mar-Mol Co., Inc. Id. Factor 2 – Location of Relevant Documents and Relative Ease of Access to Sources of Proof Factor 3 – Convenience of the Parties Hite v. Norwegian Caribbean Lines Factor 4 – Locus of the Operative Facts Factor 5 – Availability of Process to Compel Attendance of Unwilling Witnesses See Thomas Factor 6 – Relative Means of the Parties Factor 7 – Forum’s Familiarity with the Governing Law Factor 8 – Weight Accorded the Plaintiff’s Choice of Forum See e.g. Johnston v. Foster-Wheeler Constructors, Inc. Factor 9 – Trial Efficiency and Interests of Justice, based on the Totality of Circumstances 13 /s/ Janet T. Neff
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
