Marble, et al v. Snyder et al, No. 5:2017cv12942 - Document 203 (E.D. Mich. 2020)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Granting 159 MOTION to Dismiss; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 157 MOTION to Dismiss; Granting 156 MOTION to Dismiss; Granting 164 MOTION to Dismiss; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 155 MOTION to Dis miss; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 158 MOTION to Dismiss; Granting 160 MOTION to Dismiss; Granting 149 MOTION to Dismiss; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 163 MOTION to Dismiss; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 161 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)

Download PDF
Dockets.Justia.com In re Flint Water Cases. ________________________________/ Judith E. Levy United States District Judge This Order Relates To: Marble, et al. v. Snyder, et al. Case No. 17-12942 ________________________________/ This is one of the many cases that are collectively referred to as the Flint Water Cases. Defendants, a combination of private and public individuals and entities, allegedly set in motion a chain of events that led to bacteria and lead leaching into the City of Flint’s drinking water. Plaintiffs claim that Defendants subsequently concealed, ignored, or Marble, et al v. Snyder et al Doc. 203 downplayed the risks that arose from their conduct, causing them serious harm. These plaintiffs contend that the impact of what has since been called the Flint Water Crisis is still with them and continues to cause them problems.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.