LYNN et al v. City of Flint et al, No. 5:2017cv10696 - Document 96 (E.D. Mich. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Dismissing Certain Defendants. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LYNN et al v. City of Flint et al Doc. 96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re Flint Water Cases. Judith E. Levy United States District Judge ________________________________/ This Order Relates To: ALL CASES ________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS On December 15, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiffs in individual Flint Water Cases to show cause in writing by January 8, 2020 why certain Defendants should not be dismissed. These Defendants were: Jeff Dockets.Justia.com Wright, 1 Daniel Wyant,2 Dayne Walling, 3 Nick Lyon,4 Edward Kurtz,5 Liane Shekter Smith,6 Nancy Peeler,7 Robert Scott, 8 and Eden Wells.9 Co-liaison Counsel for the Plaintiffs responded on January 8, 2020, arguing that Shekter Smith should not be dismissed in several of these cases. (Carthan, No. 16-cv-10444, ECF No. 1035.) The Court will decide the issues raised by Co-Liaison Counsel at a later date. Because Plaintiffs have not otherwise responded to the Court’s order to show cause, if the following individuals are named as Defendants in this case, they are dismissed: Jeff Wright, Daniel Wyant, Dayne Walling, Nick Lyon, Edward Kurtz, Nancy Peeler, Robert Scott, and Eden Wells. 1 Wright was dismissed as a Defendant in Carthan v. Snyder, 384 F. Supp. 3d 802, 860 (E.D. Mich. 2019) and again in Walters v. Flint, No. 17-10164, 2019 WL 3530874, at *39 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2019). 2 Wyant was dismissed as a Defendant in Carthan, 384 F. Supp. at 859 and again in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *16. 3 Walling was dismissed as a Defendant in Carthan, 384 F. Supp. at 860 and again in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *39. 4 Lyon was dismissed as a Defendant in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *35. 5 Kurtz was dismissed as a Defendant in Carthan, 384 F. Supp. at 860, and was not named as a Defendant in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *3 n.5. 6 Shekter Smith is still a Defendant in Carthan, 384 F. Supp. at 859, but was dismissed in Walters on statute of limitations grounds. Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *11–*13. 7 Peeler was dismissed in Carthan, 384 F. Supp. at 858, and was not named as a Defendant in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *2 n.4. 8 Scott was not named as a Defendant in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *2 n.4. 9 Wells was not named as a Defendant in Walters, 2019 WL 3530874, at *2 n.4. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 9, 2020 Ann Arbor, Michigan s/Judith E. Levy JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on March 9, 2020. s/William Barkholz WILLIAM BARKHOLZ Case Manager 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
