Meador v. Rapelje, No. 5:2012cv10460 - Document 10 (E.D. Mich. 2012)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and Denying a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KENNY MEADOR, #645264, Petitioner, CASE NO. 5:12-CV-10460 HONORABLE JOHN CORBETT O MEARA v. LLOYD RAPELJE, Respondent. / OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER S MOTION FOR NON-PREJUDICIAL DISMISSAL, DISMISSING THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY This matter is before the Court on Petitioner s motion for non-prejudicial dismissal of his pending petition for a writ of habeas corpus so that he may return to the state courts to pursue additional challenges to his state criminal proceedings. The Court previously denied Petitioner s motion to stay the proceedings and hold the case in abeyance pending the exhaustion of additional claims. Given that Petitioner seeks to exhaust additional issues in the state courts and given that he has sufficient time to do so and comply with the one-year statute of limitations applicable to federal habeas actions, dismissal of the present petition is appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner s motion is GRANTED and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Additionally, a certificate of appealability is DENIED as reasonable jurists would not find the Court s procedural ruling debatable. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000) This case is closed. Should Petitioner wish to seek federal habeas relief following the exhaustion of state court remedies, he must file a new habeas petition in federal court within the time remaining on the one-year period of limitations. s/John Corbett O'Meara United States District Judge Date: October 24, 2012 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this date, October 24, 2012, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail. s/William Barkholz Case Manager 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
