Pierce v. Washtenaw County Jail et al, No. 4:2022cv12786 - Document 76 (E.D. Mich. 2023)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER Accepting and Adopting 74 Report and Recommendation and Denying 49 Motion for preliminary injunction filed by Roger Pierce. Signed by District Judge F. Kay Behm. (THal)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pierce v. Washtenaw County Jail et al Doc. 76 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROGER PIERCE, Case No. 22-12786 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm United States District Judge v. Curtis Ivy United States Magistrate Judge WASHTENAW CO. JAIL, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S OCTOBER 20, 2023 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 74) Currently before the court is Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy’s October 20, 2023 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 74). Magistrate Judge Ivy recommends denying Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 49). The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS and 1 Dockets.Justia.com ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 74) and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (ECF 49). SO ORDERED. Date: November 9, 2023 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
