Lang v. Social Security, Commissioner of, No. 4:2017cv14105 - Document 22 (E.D. Mich. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lang v. Social Security, Commissioner of Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DAWN LANG, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 17-14105 Honorable Linda V. Parker v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER On December 20, 2017, Plaintiff filed this lawsuit challenging the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying her application for social security benefits. The following day, this Court referred the lawsuit to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand for all pretrial proceedings, including a hearing and determination of all non-dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and/or a report and recommendation (“R&R”) on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (ECF No. 3.) The parties subsequently filed crossmotions for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 18, 20.) On September 14, 2018, Magistrate Judge Grand issued a R&R, recommending that this Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and grant Defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 21.) Magistrate Judge Grand first concludes Dockets.Justia.com that Administrative Law Judge Sarah Zimmerman (“ALJ”) gave good reasons, supported by substantial evidence for discounting the opinion of Plaintiff’s treating physician. (Id. at Pg ID 1320-23.) Magistrate Judge Grand next concludes that the ALJ did not err in failing to account for Plaintiff’s frequent absences from work to receive medical treatment. (Id. at Pg ID 1324-26.) At the end of the R&R, Magistrate Judge Grand advises the parties that they may object to and seek review of the R&R within fourteen days of service upon them. (Id. at Pg ID 1326.) He further specifically advises the parties that “[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right to appeal.” (Id.) Neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed objections to the R&R. The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge Grand. The Court therefore adopts Magistrate Judge Grand’s September 14, 2018 R&R. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 18) is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED and Defendant’s decision denying Plaintiff 2 social security benefits is AFFIRMED. s/ Linda V. Parker LINDA V. PARKER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 7, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, November 7, 2018, by electronic and/or U.S. First Class mail. s/ R. Loury Case Manager 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
