BOS GMBH & Co. KG et al v. Macauto USA, Inc. et al, No. 4:2017cv10461 - Document 96 (E.D. Mich. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER denying 87 Macuto's Motion for Attorney's Fees. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com BOS GMBH & CO. KG, et al. 4:17-CV-10461-TGB MACAUTO USA, INC., et al., ORDER DENYING MACAUTO’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES (ECF NO. 87) BOS GMBH & Co. KG et al v. Macauto USA, Inc. et al Doc. 96 DENIED I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. See B. Summary Judgement Ruling See GmbH & Co. KG v. Macauto USA, Inc. see also BOS Id. Graham Graham v. John Deere Co. KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. Id. Id. III. A. Infringement ANALYSIS Taurus IP, LLC v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. Athletic Alternatives, Inc. v. Prince Mfg., Inc. Id. unresolved ambiguity Id. requires modification to resolve the above ambiguity Id. Id. SiOnyx sic Id. SiOnyx LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. SiOnyx SiOnyx Id. B. Validity Id. Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. P’ship Celotex Celotex Corp. v. Catrett despite specific context Id. Id. either or See Naturverpackungen GmbH & Co. KG v. Biocorp C. Other Litigation Conduct Biotec Biologische Markman Daubert Id. Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc. CONCLUSION Octane Fitness DENIED DATED
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
