Smith v. MacLaren, No. 4:2015cv14260 - Document 13 (E.D. Mich. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 12 Petitioner's MOTION to Dismiss, DISMISSING without Prejudice the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and DENYING a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)

Download PDF
Smith v. MacLaren Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TAHRI SMITH, Petitioner, Case No. 15-CV-14260 Hon. Terrence G. Berg v. DUNCAN MACLAREN, Respondent. ____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO DISMISS, DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY This is a habeas case brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion to voluntarily dismiss his pending petition for a writ of habeas corpus so that he may return to the state courts and pursue further challenges to his state criminal proceedings. The Court previously denied Petitioner's motion to stay the proceedings and hold this case in abeyance. Given that Petitioner seeks to exhaust additional issues in the state courts and given that he has sufficient time to do so within the one-year statute of limitations 1 Dockets.Justia.com applicable to federal habeas actions (with equitable tolling for the time his habeas case has been pending), dismissal of the present petition is appropriate. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s motion and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Additionally, the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability as reasonable jurists could not debate the correctness of the Court's procedural ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). This case is CLOSED. Should Petitioner wish to seek federal habeas relief following the exhaustion of state court remedies, he must file a NEW habeas petition in federal court within the time remaining on the oneyear period of limitations. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 12, 2017 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of record were served on December 12, 2017. s/A. Chubb Case Manager 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.