Stojcevski v. Macomb, County of et al, No. 4:2015cv11019 - Document 261 (E.D. Mich. 2021)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (SSch)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DAFINKA STOJCEVSKI, as Personal Representative of the Estate of DAVID STOJCEVSKI, Deceased, Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11019 Honorable Linda V. Parker v. COUNTY OF MACOMB, et al., Defendant. _________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER On September 30, 2019, this Court issued an Opinion and Order disposing of several dispositive motions filed by Defendants. (See ECF No. 186.) Upon review of the decision, it appears that while summary judgment was granted to the following Defendants, the dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against them and their removal as parties was omitted: Natalie Pacitto, Amber Barber, Linda Parton, Thressa Williams, and Sarah Breen. (See id. at Pg ID 6986, 6973.) Therefore, the Court is now disposing of those Defendants as parties. Further, the Court neglected to discuss Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Heather Ehrlich in its decision. But then again, so did Plaintiff in responding to the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Ehrlich and other defendants. (See ECF No. 158.) As Plaintiff did not set forth any arguments for why Ehrlich should be found to have been deliberately indifferent to David’s serious medical needs, Plaintiff can be deemed to have abandoned the claims against her. See McPherson v. Kelsey, 125 F.3d 989, 995-96 (6th Cir. 1997) (explaining that “[i]ssues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived.”); see also Courser v. Mich. House of Representatives, 831 F. App’x 161, 177-78 (6th Cir. 2020) (concluding that the plaintiff abandoned several claims by failing to make any arguments or “developed argumentation” concerning them). In any event, Ehrlich’s involvement with David was limited to performing a COWS assessment during his first and second days at the jail. (See ECF No. 186 at Pg ID 6950.) The record does not reflect facts from which a reasonable juror could conclude that David exhibited signs of a serious medical condition when Ehrlich interacted with him so as to make her subjectively aware of the need for more care than she provided. The Court, therefore, is now granting summary judgment to Ehrlich and dismissing her as a party from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Linda V. Parker LINDA V. PARKER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 22, 2021
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
